Monday, October 2, 2017

Flatliners - 13 Nerdy Nights of Horror - Day 2



            Today, we’ll be talking about a remake of a Joel Schumacher horror film that starred Kiefer Sutherland, “Flatliners.” Now, I’ve never seen the original “Flatliners,” so I have no perception of how that film is, and I’m only going to be judging this remake on its own. And Yes, I said remake, not a sequel like they’re trying to cover up.

            “Flatliners” tells of a group of medical students, doing an experiment called “flatlining,” where they’re brought back after their heart stops for a minute or so. However, after they each go through with the process, something spoopy this way comes.

            So far from what I’ve seen, nobody online seems to like this movie at all. And after seeing it for myself, I completely understand why. “Flatliners” is one of the dullest, cheapest, and most unnecessary remakes I have ever seen. And considering this was from the director of the original Swedish version of “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo,” that’s really sad. For one, this film doesn’t feel like a movie; it feels more like a “Flatliners” tv show on Fox…IN 2003!! Seriously, they have literal scenes where you can tell it was rushed through production, especially with Kiefer Sutherland’s scenes. By the way, he’s not reprising this character from the first movie, these people lied to you. And a lot of the cinematography and production value looks so basic that it feels like the film ITSELF was made by college students, but even they would put more effort than this tripe.

            This brings us into the writing, which is some of the stalest and broken dialogue that I have ever heard. Granted, I like the concept, and I do think there could have been some good potential with it. Make it seem like what the trailers were advertising, making flatlining a drug to them, and soon start going crazy, which gets Kiefer Sutherland involved to connect both movies…but we don’t get that. Instead, we get scenes that have dialogue such as “Why didn't you tell me there was a downside to flatlining?” Maybe it’s because it’s called DYING, you stupid jackass! Seriously, this was a script by Ben Ripley, who gave us “Source Code,” which was brilliant…what…what happened here? Did they just use the first draft as the main script? How desperate was Sony to shovel this out to theaters?

            Okay, how are the performances? Everyone looks so bored to be there, with the exception of Ellen Page who seems to be doing her best to carry this train wreck. She does have the best development and motivation for the experiment, she’s confident with proving her discoveries true, and she does have some genuine laughs as well. It’s just a shame they kill her off halfway through…no bullshit here, people. And after Page is axed off, we’re left with Diego Luna and Nina Dobrev to try and find something else worth of a story for the rest of the film. The only problem, is that neither of them have interesting enough story to them, nor are they even giving a shit about what kind of performance they give. Same for everyone else, even Kiefer Sutherland who looks like he really wanted to go home in his scenes.

            Now with this being a horror film, or attempting to be one, how’s the direction? Uninspired. The jump scares in this film are so by the numbers and formulaic that it’s not surprising when they actually do pop up. There’s a scene in a boat home where one of the characters is haunted by his past, and just he comes to, behind him is a super-imposed image of what’s haunting him. How is that scary?! The editing also feels very unorganized, because there’s a moment where that same guy is stabbed in the hand on the docks, and then it cuts to him with the others with a bandage on his hand. What?! Did the editor himself put this together flatlining, because it looks like it!

            Now, here’s where I’m going to talk about the biggest complaint I have with this film, and it contains spoilers, so be warned:

            So the trailers allude to some entity haunting the characters and kill them one by one right? Well, it turns out it’s brain hallucinations, that tap into what you’re the most guilty of in life, and the only way to get rid of them is to beg them for forgiveness…and they’re never consistent on if they’re real or not…okay, was this in the original film? Because if it was, then it’s at fault for that, but…WHAT?! What world…?! Reality…?! Drugs…?! What was this supposed to signify?!

            Okay, I’m wrapping up. Overall, “Flatliners” is not only a horrible remake, but it’s a horrible remake that COULD have been excellent. It had a great director, a talented writer, and a strong powerful lead, that could have made this film work. And when you make a worse film than Joel Schumacher, that’s not dignifying. Aside from the first act and Ellen Page trying her best to carry it with little screen time she has, it just completely flatlines on the audience; pun intended. And I’m not the only one; as I’m writing this, Rotten Tomatoes has a 3% approval rating, based on 37 reviews, a lower score than “The Emoji Movie.” Yikes. Is it the worst film of the year for me? No. I’ve seen far worse this year alone…doesn’t excuse that this film is shit though.

Rating: 2/10 (mostly for Ellen Page and the first act being kind of interesting)

No comments:

Post a Comment