With the success of James Wan’s “The
Conjuring” back in 2013, Warner Bros. took this as a sign to get a horror
franchise going, by adapting all of the Warren cases into feature films,
dubbing it “The Conjuring Universe.” Because everything needs to be a universe
nowadays. So far, with both “The Conjuring” and “Annabelle” movies, the series
has had relatively good success at the box office, and with the exception of
“Annabelle,” the two “Conjuring” movies and “Annabelle: Creation” turned out
pretty damn good. Some even praise them as some of the better horror films to
come out as of late.
It also highlights upon one of their
most famous cases, and one that was adapted into a film franchise back in the
late 70’s, “The Amityville Horror.” The story of Amityville is that of a man
who ended up shooting six of his family members, and how the ghosts of that
house begin to torment the next family that lived there. Despite the whole
paranormal thing being a hoax, it still remains one of the most horrifying
tales to think about. And for something as low budget at the time, it really
added to this grounded feel to it, which got to a lot of people at the time,
who admitted to being through similar scenarios.
The
original still stands as a classic, and one of the most memorable roles for
both James Brolin and Margot Kidder. Today, it may not be much, but at the time
it really got to you. The rest of the film series, I didn’t really bother with.
Aside from the 2005 Ryan Reynolds remake from Platinum Dunes, I never really
kept up with the rest of the series. None of the theatrical sequels they did,
not the made for tv movies, none of the direct-to-video releases, nothing. I
just felt like aside from the first film and the remake, there really wasn’t
much to go into about with it. That is until the past few years.
Back
at the turn of the decade, Dimension and Blumhouse were in talks of making a
brand new “Amityville” movie, to possibly cash in on the found footage craze at
the time. However, that fell through when Franck Khalfoun got on board, and
decided to go back to the basics of the series, and got it ready to show for
fans to witness…problem was, the film couldn’t find a way to theatres for a
good while. When the film got going into production, it was set to release back
in January of 2015. It had distributing troubles, companies had to sell the
film around, test screenings were negative, reshoots had to be done, trailers
popped up at one point then vanished, it was a mess. Considering how much I was
curious to find out what about this film was worth storing away to try and
release, I decide to check it out, prepared for its theatrical release on the
27th, hoping it comes to Las Vegas…and then I found out on October
8th, they dumped the film on Google Play for free, until its blu ray release
this November…I’m not kidding, look it up if you don’t believe me.
So
now that it was finally released to the public, was “Amityville: The Awakening”
worth the wait? Well, let me put it to you like this: Imagine “Texas Chainsaw
3D,” a direct sequel to the original 1970’s movie, that completely ignores any
other film in the franchise; now try mixing it in with “Book of Shadows: Blair
Witch 2,” and you have a masterpiece of shit. This is one of the most
indecisive movies that I have ever seen, because it doesn’t know what it’s
trying to be. It claims that this is a direct sequel to the Amityville series,
but it’s not; even if they try to recreate the ending style of the first film,
it doesn’t work because it was proven a hoax, so there’s no tension behind it,
thus no reason to make this movie. Hollywood needs to stop doing this! At times
it wants to be an “Amityville” movie, with a sick family member getting better
via possession; then it goes into a “Scream” wannabe at school, with the dorky
friends; then it wants to be this weird melodrama about how Mommy cares more
about the sick boy twin then ever acknowledging the daughter twin’s existence.
Oh, and there’s a little sister, played by McKenna Grace from “Gifted,” in the
movie too. Because, why the fuck not, right? This movie is hitting almost every
one of the horror clichés that we’ve established since the 1960’s, so why not
throw in a little girl to the movie? I can just imagine how that process went,
like the casting director was like Jake from “The Blues Brothers” in the
restaurant scene.
Writing
is cliché, but what about our cast and characters? Honestly, some of them are
obviously trying to make this work, especially Bella Thorne and Jennifer Jason
Leigh as the mother and oldest daughter. You get that they have a rough history
that involves the son, as if she was the one who paralyzed him by accident, and
the scenes involving them about what to do with him or how they’re going to
mend their relationship back together, has a lot of potential that could easily
work for a horror film like this…I just wish that it didn’t have to be an
attempt at reviving the “Amityville” franchise. Aside from them and McKenna
Grace, the rest of the acting is just abysmal to sit through; even with actors
like up-and-comers like Thomas Mann or veteran actors like Kurtwood Smith,
these are really uninteresting characters to watch. As for the sick son, there
really isn’t much to say about him; he’s just a corpse for a demon of the house
to possess. Oh great, check off the sick person being possessed off the cliché
list.
The
direction of this film also feels really uninspired, as you got jumpscares that
don’t amount to anything, false scares from illusions, the whole tense moment
of whether or not the child will be shot…guys, I’m grasping at what I can with
this film, but it’s giving me nothing. A similar event like this, where I saw a
film that gave me nothing, and that was “Phoenix Forgotten.” It was a horrible
movie, because it had nothing of substance worth talking about; it’s that
dreadfully boring. “Amityville: The Awakening” isn’t as bad as “Phoenix
Forgotten,” but it’s still guilty of being a colossal bore to sit through.
Overall,
don’t let curiosity get to you with “Amityville: The Awakening,” even if a
theatre does release it near you. Aside from our three main actresses, the film
suffers from really stock writing that even middle schoolers would probably get
away with doing. The acting is dull, the setting is dull, the direction is
dull…why am I even still talking about this?
Rating: 2/10
hi new on line work vist this site http://festyy.com/wq4NqU
ReplyDelete