Friday, May 13, 2016

Captain America: Civil War SPOILER ALERT!!



            After eight years of bringing superheroes and their stories to life, Marvel Studios has finally reached the third phase of their Cinematic Universe. From the beginnings with “Iron Man,” to the insanity of “Guardians of the Galaxy,” each of the films have been very successful in both box office numbers and favorable reviews across the map. And with the characters in place and the world spinning in progress, it’s time to start the summer blockbuster season with a war. But not just any war, but “Captain America: Civil War.”

            I’ve talked about the previous “Captain America” movies before, but here’s a bit of a recap. “The First Avenger” still stands as my favorite of the Phase 1 films, and is one of those films that I love more, every time I watch it. It gets me with its great World War II setting, the underdog story, the lovable characters, and all around fun atmosphere. What Joe Johnston gave to us was a love letter to that era of propaganda films, where we root for the All-American icon that we aspired to be, during times that were at their worst. Hell, that’s what Captain America was when the comic was first released.

            “The Winter Soldier,” directed by Joe and Anthony Russo, took a lot of the elements that were great about the first film and turned it up to eleven. The action was better, the acting was better, but the writing is what really sells it. Not only was it a superhero film, it was an action spy flick. The protagonist going undercover, hiding from allies that are double-crossers, limited people to back him up, discovering an evil organization still alive and working, it’s all so enticing to watch. To me, this was Marvel Studios best written film and my favorite of the MCU…that is until “Guardians of the Galaxy” took the latter spot.

            Now when it came to “Civil War,” I was in a bit of a mix here. On one hand, the Russo Brothers were returning to direct, but on the other hand, it had to follow up “Avengers: Age of Ultron” and “Ant-Man,” which were both underwhelming, especially when trying to follow up the two before them. So did “Civil War” live up to the hype that it was building up since its announcement? In some ways, it really does.

            After a mission in Lagos goes wrong, the United Nations decides to put up a bill restricting the Avengers on their missions, which divides the team up. Tony Stark believes it’s for the better to keep the world safe and the team in check, but Steve Rogers believes it’s against everything he stands for. And with Bucky still on the loose and framed for murder, it becomes an all-out war between Team Iron Man and Team Captain America.

            Now let me say, the action in this film is spectacular and very exciting. It really keeps the intense and “fuck yeah!” nature that “Winter Soldier” had, and never gets boring. Each of the main players gets their time in the spotlight, showcasing what they can do, and none of them get overshadowed by the other. The Russo Brothers really nail their eye for action, and I’m glad that they’re taking the helm for “Infinity War.” The best scene by far is when the two sides clash at the airport, which I’m sure fans had a huge nerdgasm while watching.

            I also enjoyed how they addressed the issue at hand that makes Tony and Steve go head to head. Not everyone is safe from harm during the Avengers’ missions, and that people still die no matter the situation. Heroes are always going to make sure people survive, but it isn’t always going to be 100% successful. What’s the better solution to handling it: restricting one’s self to the government’s control or keeping one on the loose, both for the sake of the people? It felt like this was the film “Batman V Superman” was trying to be, only this one felt more balanced. As you watch the film, both sides have very convincing arguments, and that there isn’t really a good or bad side to any of this…that is, except for one thing, but I’ll talk about that soon.

            The returning actors from previous MCU films all do great. They show a great deal of growth from the previous encounters, and when they take sides, you do see where they’re coming from. As the film’s release was approaching, there were two characters that had me either excited or nervous. The one that made me excited was T’Challa aka The Black Panther. Much like with Wonder Woman in “BVS,” it was such a magnificent sight to see the ruler of Wakanda finally realized in a big budget action film. His storyline was very interesting too, having a vendetta against the Winter Soldier for the death of his father, and going with the side against him to make sure his vengeance is satisfied. It really fleshes out nicely, and I have to give props to Chadwick Boseman for his brilliant performance in the role. After “42” and “Get On Up,” it really pleases me to know that this fresh actor is getting more work in the future. Now the one character that made me nervous was of course Spiderman. Now my worry about this character being in the movie wasn’t because Andrew Garfield wasn’t playing him anymore (which I was still upset about), but rather that the film was possibly going to exploit him as to say “WE GOT THIS CASH COW, AND WE’RE GOING TO MILK IT AS LONG AS WE CAN BEFORE SONY TAKES IT BACK!” But I’m happy to report that they treated Spidey very decently. He may only show up for a small margin of the film, but I think it’s a pretty good introduction to the character. As for Tom Holland’s performance, I thought it was pretty good. The way he embodied his performance kind of reminded of “The Spectacular Spiderman” (the best Spiderman cartoon by far). He was a smart alack, he’s quick with his reflexes, but is still inexperienced. Is he the best actor to play Spiderman? Well…I can’t confirm that yet, at least until his solo film next year, but with what I’ve seen, I’m liking it.

            Now with all the praise I’ve given it, is it the best MCU movie? No, not really. In fact, I don’t think it’s the best “Captain America” movie either. Why? Well, the villain of this movie sucks. Zemo is just a generic waste of time, especially compared to Crossbones. Yeah, Crossbones, who appeared in “Winter Soldier,” is in this film…for about 10 minutes. For a film called “Captain America: Civil War,” you’d think it’d have a Captain America villain. Or better yet, with a film that already has conflict between the two sides, why do we even need a villain? That, and the climax of this film, while good, felt tacked on. With how big of a brawl the airport scene was, did we really need to pause and go to a new location for a two on one battle? And it goes back to Zemo, where his big plan is to show Iron Man, Cap, and Bucky a recording of Howard Stark being killed by the Winter Soldier. Okay, two things. First: didn’t we already establish that Bucky killed Howard Stark in the “Winter Soldier” movie? It’s been a couple years, so I might be wrong on this, but I believe they did establish that. And two: what would have happened if Iron Man didn’t show up? Seriously, Zemo was planning on Iron Man showing up, after getting info on Cap’s location from his team. What if they didn’t tell Stark were to go at all? Think about it. As for the two post-credit scenes, are they worth sitting through? Not really. On the plus side, there are teases for upcoming Phase 3 films, but they don’t really say that much aside from what we know now. You won’t be missing much.

            So with all that I’ve said, do I recommend “Captain America: Civil War?” Yes, I do. While the climax might not be as big as the Avengers brawl, and the villain is awful, the rest of the film is still really solid. The action, the story, the themes, the characters, everything else about it is definitely worth seeing. And if you’ve been watching these films up to this point, might as well continue on.


Rating: 8/10

No comments:

Post a Comment