Saturday, January 21, 2017
Sunday, January 8, 2017
Saturday, December 31, 2016
La La Land
In 2014, Damien Chazelle gave us the
film, “Whiplash,” and it was among my top 3 favorite films of that year. Going
from a short film to a major motion picture was definitely a big step in the
right direction for this guy, and it made me interested for what he would be
bringing forth next as his follow up. Although, considering the kind of triumph
that “Whiplash” was, it’d be hard to top it. Now as we wrap up our look at the
top three Oscar frontrunners of this season, we end it all with “La La Land.”
The film tells the story of two
people: Sebastian Wilder and Mia Dolan. Mia is a struggling actress trying to
get picked up, while Sebastian is a traditional jazz pianist trying to start up
his own club. After a few encounters, the duo hit it off and try to help each
other achieve what they want most.
When I first saw the trailers for
this film, I thought it looked good, but I didn’t think I was going to impress
me that much. But as further trailers popped up, that’s when I got the
indication that this was a Hollywood musical. Not a film based on a Broadway
musical, nor was it a jukebox musical, or an animated film with songs in it. A
fresh new Hollywood movie with songs written specifically for the silver screen.
I got a friend of mine to join me for New Year’s Eve, and I sat down thinking, “Come
on, Damien Chazelle. Show me what you’re really capable of.”
Literally
from the opening number, I was hooked. The songs, composed and
orchestrated by Justin Hurwitz and written by Benj Pasek and Justin Paul, were absolutely
hypnotic. They had me wrapped in this familiar spell that I was caught it when
I first saw films like “An American in Paris,” “Holiday Inn,” and “Singing in
the Rain.” Matched up with the choreography by Mandy Moore, the editing by Tom Cross, and the
cinematography, and you have easily a film that will go down in history with those films. With how nostalgic it felt listening to tunes like “Someone in the Crowd”
and “A Lovely Night,” it made me happy to a point where I felt myself close to
crying. That shows you how damn good a film can be.
I
also love watching the story between Mia and Sebastian unfold. Of course, they
don’t like each other at first, especially when their first few encounters
leave Sebastian in a relatively bad mood. But as they get to know each other
better, you see these two get used to the things that one loves yet the other
hates, and help each other find that spark that they need to really bring themselves
to that goal, whether for the better or worse. Originally, the duo was planned
to be Miles Teller and Emma Watson, but I feel like Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone
were a better fit. With this being the third film that they’ve collaborated on
as a couple, the other two being “Crazy Stupid Love” and “Gangster Squad,” they
really have left a place in cinema history as the modern day Hollywood couple, in
the same vein as Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers.
A
true major selling point that I loved about the movie was how it takes risky
moves with the clichéd love story musical, especially with its ending. Despite
it being a bit down, I came out completely satisfied with it. It gave me this feeling
of reassurance that I hadn’t felt all year, and I was extremely happy. I think that’s
something a film should be applauded for, is leaving you with that true moment
of satisfaction that sticks even after leaving.
If
you have yet to see “La La Land,” what are you doing reading this for then? Go
out and see this damn movie right now! It’s getting major buzz at the Oscars
for Best Picture, and they’re right to declare that. From its acting, to its
story, its choreography, and fantastic music, it’s a film that deserves to be
applauded for its love letter to the Old Hollywood musicals of yesterday.
Rating: 10/10
Also, if you’re
reading this now, thank you so much for sticking with me to the very end of
this year, because it fills me with some form of satisfaction that somebody or
some people take time out of their day to read what I have to say about a
movie. Whether it’s good or bad, it feels me with such a rewarding feeling that
I’m proud. I’ve been doing these reviews for over five years straight now, and I
don’t regret it. I’ve come out liking films that I would have never known
existed, or even considered my cup of tea, but they managed to leave such a big
impression on me. And as someone who thrives to become a film maker one day, I
see it as lessons of what works about this film right now, and what little
things can I notice that would be important to know.
Whatever the
future may hold, good or bad, I just want you to know that I love you all and thank
you for reading this. If you would, please leave a comment, so I know who the
best people are, and I wish you a Happy New Year!
Next Time: The Best and Worst Films of
2016
Saturday, December 24, 2016
Manchester by the Sea
Continuing off of last time, where
we discussed one of the three major Oscar frontrunners, “Moonlight.” Now this
time, we’ll be going over the second film, “Manchester by the sea.”
Directed and co-written by Kenneth
Lonergan, the film tells the story of Lee Chandler, a Boston janitor who
returns to his hometown, after finding out that his brother had died. While
there, he ends up becoming the caretaker of his nephew, Patrick, and the two
try to reconcile after several years apart.
A lot of the buzz for this movie has
been centered on its cast, and rightfully so. Casey Affleck as Lee Chandler
delivers his strongest performance to date. While the film starts off with him
hearing the news of his brother, you see just how fucked up this guy’s life
gets as the film goes on. Depression constantly clouds his mind, and thus, it
leads to him dethatching himself from those close, in fear of making the same
mistakes again. Affleck is currently the frontrunner for the Best Actor Oscar,
and I get why he would be.
Lucas
Hedges as Patrick, while is a bit of a bratty douche, does still make this
character likable. Being at very young age to lose a dad and have a train-wreck
mother not there, you get the feeling of him trying to hold back his emotions
throughout the film. The scenes that Affleck and Hedges share are easily the
best part of the movie, as neither one is happy with the decisions the other
suggests, and the banter with them feels truly genuine. Hedges is also said to
be a major nominee for Best Supporting, and I feel like it’s well deserved. The
rest of the cast, consisting of Michelle Williams as Lee’s ex-wife, Kyle
Chandler as Lee’s late-brother, Gretchen Mol as Patrick’s mom, Kara Hayward and
Ana Baryshnikov as Patrick’s girlfriends, C.J. Wilson as Lee’s family friend,
and even Matthew Broderick as Patrick’s future step-father, are all really
good.
So we have a cast that does
exceptionally well, so are there any downfalls? Yes…VERY yes. On paper, the story is very relatable, but in terms of execution, it doesn't land. The film is about two hours and seventeen minutes, and you really feel every second of that. The
pacing is dreadfully slow and takes forever to get through scenes, that I made
a game to count all the scenes that could have easily been either cut down or
cut entirely. If you had this film at a simple one hundred minutes, it would
have been much easier to go through. The narrative flow also got a little
distracting, as flashbacks are sewn in so abruptly, that there were times I was
left confused on if we were in the past or present, and that took me out of the
movie.
And
if I had to be honest, it felt like this year’s “Extremely Loud and Incredibly
Close.” I mean, sure this isn’t AS bad as “Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close,”
but it still has the same feel of a Lifetime channel movie released in
theaters, and does almost everything in its power to get Oscar recognition.
Family member dies, so not-so-social family member comes back home, after
family is a little broken up because other members died in the past, so he tries
to put things back together with those troubled. It’s like, “Look at all our
attempts to make you cry, Audience! Please, cry!” And considering it’s slow pace
and off-putting flashback inserts mixed with it, it never really got me
invested in these characters’ motives, despite the actors’ performances. That,
and the audience I was with might have ruined it, with people forgetting to
turn off their phones…seriously, why have I been having bad luck with audiences
this year?! I think this is like the eighth or ninth film I’ve had audience
trouble!
Overall,
if you enjoyed “Manchester by the Sea,” more power to you. For me, this didn’t
really sit well while watching it. Sure, it’s got some good cinematography and
the performances by Affleck and Hedges are fantastic, but nothing else really
felt that rewarding of an experience. I didn’t think the film was horrible, but
I wouldn’t call it good either. As far as I’m concerned, this is one of the weaker
Oscar frontrunners.
Rating: 5/10
Next review: "La La Land"
Next review: "La La Land"
Wednesday, December 21, 2016
Moonlight
So, it’s December again, which means
two things: The Holidays are here, and just in time for Oscar films to reveal
themselves to the public. However, this year has had quite a few films that not
many people are making a definitive choice with what could be the definitive
Best Picture frontrunner. So far, we’re down to three films that could take
home the gold: “Moonlight,” “Manchester By the Sea,” and “La La Land.” Are
these three worth all the hype? Well, let’s first discuss “Moonlight.”
“Moonlight” tells the life story of
a black kid, Chiron, as we see his life through his childhood, his adolescence,
and his adulthood, and his interactions with his mother, a young couple that
takes care of him, and his best friend who he has homosexual feelings for.
At first glance, you’d assume the
film was just a black version of Richard Linklater’s “Boyhood,” but when you
sit through the whole film, you realize that it has a lot more to offer. Don’t
get me wrong, I enjoyed “Boyhood,” but aside from the film’s gimmick of being
filmed over the course of twelve years, and performances from Ethan Hawke and
Patricia Arquette, it didn’t have much else going for it. My biggest problem
with “Boyhood” is that the main character isn’t nearly as interesting as either
his parents, and doesn’t really captivate me in what he’s going through.
This
is where “Moonlight” differs. While it does have standout performances from its
supporting cast, I felt investment with the protagonist, Chiron, and his
struggles with how he should be defining himself in the kind of environment he
lives in and the people surrounding him, both good and bad. The struggle of
trying to fit into this world as a child, to puberty coming into play in his
life, and how his life is in better check as an adult, is perfectly showcased
through Barry Jenkins stellar directing, and the performances by all three
actors that play Chiron. And the same is realized in through Chiron’s friend,
Kevin. While he may not have as much of an in depth analysis as Chiron, you
definitely feel like you have, every time he pops up on screen. He may have
fallen down a different path, but similar feelings are felt within this
character.
I absolutely love the cast of this
film, but there are two major standouts throughout the whole film. One is
Mahershala Ali as Juan, a drug dealer that ends up being the male role model
that Chiron has in his life. Every time he pops up on screen, he has such a
welcoming and heartwarming approach to him that never escapes. While he may get
funds for such foul jobs, it never seems like that, and makes you want to be
around the guy, like he was a big brother to you. The other standout role is
Naomie Harris as Chiron’s mom, who is a flat out bitch in this movie.
Neglectful, abusive, addictive, and just an all-around terrible mother, but
Chiron still has to deal with it, regardless. These two are frontrunners for the Best Supporting Oscars, but I feel like the major winner is going to be Ali,
and well deserving of it.
I have to say, I wasn’t expecting
this film to be as good as it was, but I’m glad it was. “Moonlight” is a stand
out film that is well deserving of its praise, and I’m wishing it the best this
Oscar season. If you were disappointed with “Boyhood,” then give this film a
watch and get the satisfaction that you were needing of.
Rating: 10/10
Next review: "Manchester by the Sea"
Next review: "Manchester by the Sea"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)